AI therapy systems hit Article 50, Nordics must mark or pull

From today, every AI system that offers therapy or emotional support in the EU must mark its output or face fines, and Nordic builders must decide tonight whether to comply or withdraw.

TRANSPARENCY WAVE HITS THERAPY SYSTEMS The third wave of the EU AI Act is live. Article 50 now applies to every AI system that interacts with individuals, including those used for therapy or emotional support. Four rules: 1. Users must be told they are interacting with an AI system, not a human. 2. AI-generated or manipulated content must be marked in a machine-readable format. 3. Emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation systems must disclose their use. 4. Deepfakes and AI-generated text on matters of public interest must be labelled. The watermarking requirement is not optional. It applies to synthetic audio, image, video, and text. Metadata identifiers, cryptographic watermarks, or other technical solutions that allow reliable detection are required. A statement that content is AI-generated is not enough. Systems already on the market before August 2, 2026 have until December 2, 2026 to comply. Anything placed on the market from August 2 onwards must mark its output from day one. THERAPY SYSTEMS UNDER THE ACT Therapy and emotional support systems are not classified as high-risk under the AI Act, but they are caught by Article 50. The Act does not distinguish between purpose-built therapy chatbots and general-purpose AI systems used for emotional support. Both must comply. The European Commission has published a Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content. It is voluntary, but it provides a recognised route for demonstrating compliance. The Commission’s guidelines on Article 50 clarify that the watermarking requirement applies to all providers, including businesses that develop or commission their own AI applications and put them into service under their own name. NORDIC BUILDERS FACE A DECISION Nordic builders of therapy and emotional support systems must act tonight. Three paths: 1. Comply. Implement machine-readable watermarking and disclosure mechanisms. The Code of Practice and Commission guidelines provide a roadmap. This path keeps systems on the market but requires investment in technical solutions and ongoing compliance. 2. Withdraw. Pull systems from the EU market until compliance is achieved. This path avoids fines but cedes the field to foreign providers who comply. 3. Wait. Accept the risk of fines and enforcement action. The maximum penalty is €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. For SMEs and start-ups, the penalty is whichever is lower. This path is not recommended. The network has not spoken on this subject before. The decision is new, and the clock is running.

researched · 3 sources

7 Augreaches everyone